Masculinity: A Poisoned Chalice?
Corporate
India was first perturbed when news came in that Café Coffee Day owner VG
Siddhartha’s was reported missing and search operations were on to locate him. Within
a day his body was found in the Nethravati river near Mangaluru and everyone’s
worst fears were confirmed. It was another case of suicide since he had written
a note to his associates sharing his multiple financial woes and pressures. Men
are known to commit suicide when faced with financial ruin.
V G Siddhartha
made news in the late nineties when he started the Café Coffee Day chain of cafes.
More than a decade ago I was pleasantly surprised to see that the home-grown
CCD had gone global when I saw the familiar logo jostling for space with other
coffee houses in Vienna. Siddhartha not only converted the family business of
growing coffee on plantations to exporting beans and more, but also created a
trendy coffee house culture for the youth in India. Today CCD is not just a
hang-out zone, but as I have frequently seen, it is also a popular place for
SoHo entrepreneurs to meet clients and associates.
Why did
such a successful businessman need to commit suicide? We know that thousands of
farmers have committed suicide over crop failures and the pressure of pending
loans. But does the owner of India’s largest coffee plantation need to do the
same? Some may ask why he couldn’t just run away like so many of his peers.
Others are calculating his overall assets and overall liabilities and find that
the books are not so skewed that he couldn’t pay off his loans. Was it the fear
of indignity and shame of being thought a failure, rather than the fear of the
debtor’s prison that compelled him to take his life?
Rates of
suicide are increasing in India and is reported
to have grown by nearly one and a half times between 1987 and 2007. Suicide is
known to have many causes. Mental health conditions like depression, bipolar
disorders, schizophrenia and other conditions are known to increase the risk of
suicide. But in over half of those who died from suicide, at least in the US
there was no mental illness. Men are known to be at higher risk and according to
records from India the suicide rate of men is between one and a half to twice
as much in women. However in India the rates of suicide among women is
disproportionately high compared to other countries and studies show it is related to their secondary social
status and conflicts in the family arising due to increasing education and
empowerment. But why do men, who have greater social status commit suicide?
What are the conflicts that they face? Research into farmer suicides in India has shown how
changing aspirations within a new economic paradigms and ideologies of
masculinity, honour and status interact with agrarian failure to create new
conflicts among men.
The list of
causes for suicide reported
by Government of India include reasons like bankruptcy or indebtedness, failure
in examinations, fall in social reputation, unemployment, career problems. For many
of these reasons the proportion of male suicides is much higher than among
women. In case of reasons like bankruptcy, indebtedness or employment and career
problem it seems like a cause that is exclusively applicable for men. In order
to understand the higher rates of male suicide and the how a sense of failure
get linked to it may be useful to understand ‘masculinity’and how it interacts
with honour and failure as indicated in the study referred to earlier.
Masculinity
is the social idea of what it means ‘to be a man’. It includes a set of beliefs,
expectations and actions related to men which is specific to any particular
society. While there may be commonalities across time and regions there are
also many specificities. At the same time since it is a ‘social idea’, the ideas
within a specific time or place are held not only by men but by ‘all’ in that
society. While boys are born biologically male, they are ‘bred’ into becoming
men by a process of socialization which includes imbibing rules and lessons on
how they should think, feel and act in a matter which is appropriate within the
existing social situation.
There is
greater clarity now on how girls are socialized to accept a subordinate position
through norms which differentiate and limit their opportunities and resources
as they grow up. In a similar manner, boys become accustomed to privileges and
become imbued with a sense of ‘entitlement’. While the specifics of what boys
and later men come to expect as being their ‘due’ because they are the ‘son’ or
‘husband’ or ‘father’ is different in different societies, the idea of feeling ‘entitled’
to such advantages because they are ‘men’ is common.
This sense
of entitlement is clearly the patriarchal dividend that men and boys enjoy, but
it is not without a cost. It comes with a series of expectations and assumptions
as well. Men have to be the ‘providers’ in the family, their job is to ‘protect’
their family and its honor and to be the ‘procreator’ especially of more men to
carry on the lineage. All boys are goaded to succeed, and every achievement is
celebrated. Failure is frowned upon and seen as ‘unbecoming’. This often translates
to the parental expectation that boys must come first in class and their
successes are often hyped and shared widely. This builds a pressure of
expectation and boys and men are often ‘untrained’ to manage failure. Failure
to perform or fulfil the expectations of being a man is akin to becoming an ‘non-man’,
a state that is difficult if not impossible to exist in.
Consider contemporary
life and its multiple realities from the perspective of the ‘common’ but ‘entitled’
man. Many of the settled realities of the past are changing rapidly. Roles of being
a successful ‘provider’ are being disrupted as old opportunities, related to
farming, jobs or even starting local businesses, as well as rural and urban
locations have changed within a generation. Women and girls are now more confident
and assertive and need much less ‘protection’ and much more ‘opportunity’. They
have also ventured into the public and economic domain disrupting men’s primary
position in these spaces. Procreative success no longer lies in siring a line
of sons.
How do men
adapt to such changes? To adapt to change one must be resilient and know how to
manage disappointments. Unfortunately, boys are forbidden to cry, the child’s
simple and possibly reflex response to disappointment. As grown up men they don’t
know how to share their feelings of sadness and frustration. Men mostly vent through
anger, aggression and violence. It is therefore not surprising that as contemporary
society goes through changes and women’s subordinate position in society is no
longer acceptable to women, we see signs of violence everywhere.
Women are no
longer willing to be the passive bearers of their family’s honour. Men who are
expected to ‘protect’ this honour are unable to deal with this assertion by
women and ‘punish’ women’s transgressions through what are known as ‘honor’
crimes. Brothers are killing their sisters, fathers their daughters and jilted
lovers maiming their intended beloved by throwing acid on their faces. However,
I also recall a case from the time I lived in Lucknow where a man killed his
daughter first then shot his wife and other children and finally hung himself
when he came to know his daughter had married a man from another caste. Men are
unable to face the shame of being without ‘honour’. To be a ‘failure’ to be in ‘debt’
to have your daughter elope with an ‘undesireable’ are all situations which cause
loss of ‘honour’ within the current definitions of ‘masculinity’ and to take
one’s life sometimes seems the only way out. It may have been so with V G Siddhartha
as well. Violence against others and self-harm are two sides of the same coin
of men being unable to cope with being an ‘un-man’ in their own eyes.
The
question is how does this understanding help any of us, or how is it germane to
our lives. Most of us are not professional social scientists or social workers.
Most of us may have little to do with suicide prevention but all of us deal
with ‘masculinity’ probably every day in our lives. Being part of society we
shape the way masculinity is defined and played out by ourselves and others
around us on a daily basis. This is something that we can all change. If men
have to become more caring towards themselves and towards others, boys need to taught
how not to be ‘entitled’. If men need to become more resilient and less violent
they need to learn to cry when they are hurt or disappointed. Boys need to be
given ‘affection’ and learn to show affection towards others. As father,
mother, brother, sister, friend, colleague we need to all react and respond to
boys and men differently. Only then will masculinity no longer remain a poisoned
chalice.
So true and written lucidly. Excellent.
ReplyDeleteBoys must be taught not only to express their affection but their emotions. As Bernard Shaw had said 'What the world needs today is love, Christian love'. By Christian love he meant 'Love thy neighbour as thyself'.
Spot on Abhijeet Da. The masculinity lens draws out the core of the issue..very well said
ReplyDelete